Copy of a letter to Edward Colgan, chief executive of Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, about Shepton Mallet Community Hospital.
I write in connection with your on-going review of community health services in Shepton Mallet and surrounding area.
I am a retired general medical practitioner from the Grove House Surgery in Shepton Mallet and for 35 years I attended the Shepton Mallet District Hospital and its successor, Shepton Mallet Community Hospital.
I retired in 1997 and now live in West Pennard, between Shepton Mallet and Glastonbury, and am still registered with my old surgery. I have been a supplier of healthcare and am now a potential recipient of it.
Any notional economy made by your trust would be also partly offset by the increased travel costs to relatives visiting their loved ones in Bath, Bristol, Yeovil or Taunton. Public transport in our area is scarce and becoming scarcer, and is costly and time consuming. Motor fuel is increasingly expensive.
Again, the costs would simply be shifted elsewhere, this time to members of the community.
I call upon your review body to consider most seriously the alternative of upgrading the Shepton Mallet Community Hospital by building long-awaited and long-promised replacements for the current “temporary” buildings and continuing with the present excellent and cost-effective service.
I understand that Shepton Mallet Community Hospital had a bed-occupancy rate of around 96 per cent last month. It must be that the cost of a bed at Shepton Mallet Community Hospital is less than that of a bed at the district general hospitals in Bath, Bristol, Yeovil and Taunton.
At present all of these hospitals have the ability to transfer their convalescent patients to Shepton Mallet Community Hospital, thus freeing beds for more seriously ill patients.
In the absence of Shepton Mallet Community Hospital, patients would be either sent home prematurely, to their possible detriment, or block a more expensive bed. An economy made by your trust would not be an economy at all: it would merely shift the cost to another part of the NHS. Surely this would not be a desirable outcome?






